Federal Daily News

Joint Chiefs chairman notes retiree concerns over proposed Tricare fee hikes

The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff issued a brief statement Feb. 21 that offered a ray of hope to retired military service members who could be affected by proposed hikes in the cost of their Tricare coverage.

While Gen. Martin E. Dempsey noted that there are “no easy answers” to upcoming budget challenges, he said that the Defense Department continues to review solutions to the ballooning cost of military health care — and made special note of proposals to increase some Tricare fees.

“I want those of you who serve and who have served to know that we’ve heard your concerns, in particular your concern about the tiered enrollment fee structure for Tricare in retirement,” Dempsey said in the statement. “You have our commitment that we will continue to review our health care system to make it as responsive, as affordable, and as equitable as possible.”

Among other things, the department’s 2013 proposal budget would establish a tiered structure under which Tricare enrollment fees would vary according to a retiree’s retirement pay. The budget also calls for “modest” annual fees for Tricare beneficiaries over age 65 when they transition to Medicare coverage and use Tricare for secondary coverage.

“In forming this budget, we looked at all cost variables,” Dempsey said in the statement. “Many of you will know that pay and benefits account for more than one-third of the budget and that health care costs in particular have increased from $19 billion in 2001 to $48 billion today. We had to act to slow this growth.”



 

Reader comments

Tue, Feb 28, 2012

Is the health care costs tiered for the person who made that decision to charge more for those who earned the higher pension in the military? Is his /her retirement income set up in a way where more health care cost would be paid because the/she saved more?

Tue, Feb 28, 2012

How can tiered be fair. In the civilian world, is a mammogram 25 dollars for one person and 150 dollars for another? Does a police captain have to pay 3 dollars for a burger and a police sergeant 2 dollars. Is the same house on sale off post 60,000.00 for a private and 150,000 for a major? Who made this decision and is balancing the budget off the backs of military leaders (senior NCE and Officers) who have been serving for 25-30 years? Again....who made this suggestion?

Mon, Feb 27, 2012

Arizona - I would hardly compare a federal employee to a service member. Military care should be free. Federal workers need a trip to the bargaining table with the average taxpayer on the other side, who is making considerably less in total compensation, in order to find the savings needed. I bet after a negotiation that put a federal employee on an equal footing with the private sector worker in a similar position, there would even be enough to honor the promise of free care for our military. And, that's not my opinion, but one from a federal employee himself whose sentiments I lament. I never understood the need for public unions when the politician on the other side of the table can be so easily bought with campaign contributions of Big Labor. (a little too incestuous for my comfort)

Fri, Feb 24, 2012

Wonder how much war injuries played in the jump from 2001 $19B to $48B today

Fri, Feb 24, 2012 Doug Johnson Minneapolis

Hungry for Spaghetti? Read this: I'm rarely surprised any more. Promises... I stopped banking on promises. Promises are what got us into this mess. What do you expect? i.e. So-so security was NEVER to be touched, now it's filled with I-owe-yous like the suitcase in "Dumb and Dumber" (I make a compelling arguement using that movie to back me up, huh). Or, have you ever seen a "temporary tax" go away? More and more Americans look to the government to solve their problems, suckling from the big sow is a natural desire. I should talk, I'm a federal employee and in the reserve, but I have written my congressman and suggested a paycut across the board for all fed employees; as well as a good dose of attrition . Why should we (fed emp) be guaranteed anything? If you want more or better, get out there and sell yourself, get hired and start climbing the ladder; or be an entrepreneur, hire the people, pay the taxes, fight the regulations... they have no guarantees, in fact they're wiped out by the government if they don't conform. There are numerous examples when federal or military folk, including Generals, have been forced to retire and still get theirs. Not so out there in the real world. I don't expect a single promise to come true. Yes, it sucks when they don't, but I'm not ready to throw a rope over the rafter. Get out of the way so those who REALLY deserve what was promised (the maimed, burned, blinded, etc) get theirs. I'm accountable for me, I'll tend to my health, eat half-way right, put a few bucks away, and see what happens. But even healthy living won't guarantee anything, ask Steve Jobs. Yes, it's tough to make plans when promises are broke, but I don't believe in guarantees, there's always a hitch. As far as I'm concerned my federal, miliatry retirement, and Tricare are still good deals, and if it goes away I'll still have what my great grandad had... nothing but good ol' fashion freedom; but it can be argued even that is being threatened. However, when THAT goes to far, well, them's fightin' words. That's a hill I'll die on. Ok... got that off my chest.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above


Show/hide